1) the witness fielded by Ingabire, Colonel Habimana former spokesman of FDRL a terrorist organisation that is creating havoc in Congo, he is on record talking to journalist for FDRL ....this guy is convicted and is serving life sentence.
a) in Rwanda , in Europe , in USA everywhere .... a convicted terrorist serving life sentence loose his civil liberties therefore can not testify for or against because he is not liable of what he may say .....
b) the court admitted Colonel Habimana to be heard not as a Witness which is a lie you just fabricated for reason i don't know .... he was to be heard just as someone who may help the court to understand the case but he is not under oath
c) a convict serving sentence in jail in Europe, in USA or anywhere can be subjected to random search in his cell ..... you don't need an order from the court , to search a prisoner , he was searched and off course he can be searched anytime ..... he is not a free man like me or you or presumed innocent he is already convicted .....he wasn't interrogated as you claim ....and even if he was interrogated it is not against the law to interrogate a convicted terrorist .....and it is not to smear witness because he is not witness he can't testify in the court......
Reply
RNW Player
International Justice
From the former Yugoslavia to Rwanda, Cambodia and Lebanon, Radio Netherlands Worldwide reports on international justice. We offer background news and reporting on war crimes, human rights abuses and genocide.
why so much lies,
1) the witness fielded by Ingabire, Colonel Habimana former spokesman of FDRL a terrorist organisation that is creating havoc in Congo, he is on record talking to journalist for FDRL ....this guy is convicted and is serving life sentence.
a) in Rwanda , in Europe , in USA everywhere .... a convicted terrorist serving life sentence loose his civil liberties therefore can not testify for or against because he is not liable of what he may say .....
b) the court admitted Colonel Habimana to be heard not as a Witness which is a lie you just fabricated for reason i don't know .... he was to be heard just as someone who may help the court to understand the case but he is not under oath
c) a convict serving sentence in jail in Europe, in USA or anywhere can be subjected to random search in his cell ..... you don't need an order from the court , to search a prisoner , he was searched and off course he can be searched anytime ..... he is not a free man like me or you or presumed innocent he is already convicted .....he wasn't interrogated as you claim ....and even if he was interrogated it is not against the law to interrogate a convicted terrorist .....and it is not to smear witness because he is not witness he can't testify in the court......