Radio Netherlands Worldwide

SSO Login

More login possibilities:

Close
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
Home
Friday 31 October  
ICC on-site visit, DRC
Map
The Hague, Netherlands
The Hague, Netherlands

Judge Cotte: “We are making progress”

Published on : 20 June 2012 - 10:31am | By International Justice Tribune (Photo: ICC)
More about:

Interview with ICC judge Bruno Cotte, presiding judge at the second trial at the ICC*

By Franck Petit, The Hague

The Katanga-Ngudjolo trial has ended last month. Pending the judgment, what practical experience did it bring to the International Criminal Court (ICC)?

Related content

It is the second trial to be heard by the ICC and we were able to “get it in order” to be tried in one short year. For various reasons, the chamber that heard the first case took two years. So we’re making progress. In order to achieve an expeditious trial, we read the prosecutor’s witness statements in advance, which helped us to determine with him which witnesses had to appear and how much time to plan for their testimony. So we managed to considerably reduce the number of hours initially suggested.

Nevertheless, we’ve already gone through four years of procedure, without the appeal…
I am a man who likes things to get done and I would have preferred that this case be completed more quickly… which would have perhaps made it possible for me to hear a second case during my short mandate! There are several explanations for such a length of time – not least, the real complexity of new legal questions brought before the Court. Certainly, some of them could have been dealt with at the preliminary stage. In hindsight and given the experience gained, it would be worth rethinking the exact role of the pre-trial chamber.

Do you find such a length of time acceptable?
We are all aware of the need to observe a reasonable deadline. The European Court of Human Rights has been reminding us of this for years. Clearly, for a French judge, four years is long. It is therefore necessary to move more quickly. At the same time, the sentences for the crimes addressed by the ICC—such as genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes—are sufficiently serious to keep us from rushing. In my opinion, there is an inherent tardiness in these types of cases.

But… is acquittal really an available option in this system?
It is important, essential even, that those who appear before the ICC as suspects and then even as the accused, are not considered guilty in advance! Don’t forget about the presumption of innocence! If the trials take a long time, it is precisely because it is necessary to gather as much evidence as possible to be able to make a decision with full knowledge of the facts. There would be nothing worse than the feeling that the die is already cast before arguments even begin.

Did you try to hold hearings in Congo?
Indeed, the Court can be made visible through hearings held on site. However, when, as in the case I’m dealing with, the region involved remains “insecure,” that becomes extremely difficult. In fact, there would be nothing worse than hearings held on location but in a security context that would cause the ICC to appear to be a military court. Hearings held behind barbed wire would have the opposite effect of what we’re looking for. On the other hand, the on site visit made by the Chamber seems to me an indispensible procedural act. To a certain degree, even if it is reduced, it also meets this need for visibility. Above all, through the findings made on site, it contributes to the search for and discovery of the truth.

Should the defence have more means?
An excellent defence is indispensible… especially, again, when we think of the sentences at stake. That is a frequent question in our debates—defence teams and representatives of victims deploring the inferior means at their disposal compared to the prosecutor. Yes, it is a subject of debate. In any case, one thing is certain: the defense must be able to fully fulfill its role.

And what needs to be improved on the prosecution side?
Of course, we can always do better. Their investigation methods are sometimes criticised. In this regard, Trial Chamber I found [in the Lubanga case] that the use of intermediaries, perhaps insufficiently monitored, had most probably been excessive. In hindsight and aware of the difficulties encountered, it would be a good idea to rely more on forensic investigation techniques. The court should be able to improve in this area in order to present evidence likely to reinforce the testimonies that we know are often fragile.

(*) Revised and amended by judge Cotte, original version in French.
 

Discussion

ALI Ouattara 11 July 2012 - 4:58pm / Côte d'Ivoire

International Justice Tribune must not died.

Post new comment

Please be reminded all comments must be in English, short and to the point - guideline 250 words. Abusive and inappropriate comments will be removed.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

RNW Player

International Justice

From the former Yugoslavia to Rwanda, Cambodia and Lebanon, Radio Netherlands Worldwide reports on international justice. We offer background news and reporting on war crimes, human rights abuses and genocide.