Hi Ken, and thanks for contacting us. Steve has obviously responded already, but I just wanted to let you know that the aim of the piece with him and Cindi was not to counter claims made by Eric Anderson, but to start with his response to that interview and let his/their story unfold from there. Perhaps we didn't make the purpose of this story clear enough. We weren't dismissing science; we just had that conversation a few weeks prior.
Hi Ken, and thanks for contacting us. Steve has obviously responded already, but I just wanted to let you know that the aim of the piece with him and Cindi was not to counter claims made by Eric Anderson, but to start with his response to that interview and let his/their story unfold from there. Perhaps we didn't make the purpose of this story clear enough. We weren't dismissing science; we just had that conversation a few weeks prior.