| Programme name | Listen | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Africa in Progress | ![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Bridges with Africa | ![]() |
![]() |
|||
| Earth Beat | |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Euro Hit 40 | |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Global Perspective | |
|
![]() |
||
| South Asia Wired | |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
| The State We're In | |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
| More >> | |||||
|   | |||||
| Times and frequencies | |||||
Email news bulletin
What's on - Programme Preview
Press Review - of the leading Dutch newspapers every weekday
Media Network
Euro Hit 40 - Europe's No. 1 chart show
But there is another possible reading. The whole structure of Islam itself, rather than "Islamophobia", is set up precisely to erect "walls of supposed oppositions" between people. The wall between “Henk and Ingrid” (typical Dutch names) and “Ahmed and Aisha” is not the handiwork of the critics of Islam but of Islam itself. Apart from some superficial features of language and geographical origin, there is essentially little difference between both couples. It is only Islam that condemns the former to disenfranchised subordination (dhimmitude) in this life and afterwards an eternity in hell, while the latter are to inherit the heavens later and the earth now.
This difference is not real, it exists only in the imagination of Islam believers, it's an "alleged opposition”. But Islamic law does lay down that this imaginary opposition gets a very tangible impact, namely all kinds of inequalities between Muslims and non-Muslims. The believers arrogate to themselves rights that they deny to the unbelievers. This self-righteousness, which is the self-proclaimed essence of Islam, erects "walls of supposed oppositions". Would the Queen, speaking on behalf of the Dutch people, have had that analysis in mind?