Radio Netherlands Worldwide

SSO Login

More login possibilities:

Close
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
Home
Sunday 12 February RNW - NEWS AND ANALYSIS FROM THE NETHERLANDS IN 10 LANGUAGES, WORLDWIDE 24/7 ON RADIO, TV AND ONLINE
US troops in Iraq
Paul Anstiss's picture
Map
Baghdad, Iraq
Baghdad, Iraq

US troops withdraw from Iraq’s cities

Published on : 30 June 2009 - 11:28am | By Paul Anstiss
More about:

Tuesday has been declared “a day of national sovereignty”. Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki insists that Iraq’s 750,000 soldiers and police can defend the nation from insurgents linked to al-Qaeda.

 

However, there remain fears that they may not be up to the job. This month alone more than 200 people have been killed in bomb attacks in Iraq, and all leave for security forces personnel has been cancelled.

 

Peace at a price
The security situation is nowhere near as volatile as it was in 2006 and 2007. The relative stability has been helped by the ‘surge’ of 20,000 extra US troops. But according to Iraq expert Phyllis Bennis of the Institute for Policy Studies, the ceasefire declared by Muqtada al-Sadr’s forces, and payments made to keep resistance fighters on side played a more vital role.

 

Peace has come at a price. According to Dr Bennis, social cohesion has been torn apart.

 

“The sectarian violence that had ravaged the once cosmopolitan mixed cities of Iraq, most particularly Baghdad, had done its job in the sense that there were no longer mixed neighbourhoods. The ethnic cleansing designed to create little pockets of ethnically pure Shia, or Sunni, or Kurdish, or Turkmen communities was largely complete.”

 

False withdrawal
Only a small number of US forces in training and advisory roles will remain in urban areas. The bulk of 131,000 American troops in Iraq will be stationed elsewhere. US commanders must gain permission from Iraqi authorities to conduct operations, but American troops retain a unilateral right to “legitimate self-defence”.

 

Dr Bennis says that, in reality, little has changed:

 

“There is a huge construction boom underway of the military bases just on the edge of the city. So, all that’s going to change is where those combat troops sleep. They will sleep just outside the city limits We’re hearing about the concept of re-missioning, in which combat troops will be given a new mission, supposedly as trainers, when actually their mission will be the same. This is a false withdrawal, if you will, unfortunately.”

 

Discussion

Hiram 30 June 2009 - 11:12pm
"We the usa started this lousy war over oil." You might be right but Saddam had a very large part in starting the war. Saddam went to war by invading another country for it's oil and riches and he lost the war. When he lost the war he agreed to abide by the conditions set on him and his country. He used the greed of the French and Germans to keep from abiding by the conditions set on him and he pushed the envelope and got punished. Those Americans and non-Americans who died for their countries didn't die for oil, they died fighting for a cause they believed in. Whatever the reasons, they died to keep tyrants like Sadam in check. { As to a lousy world, you are right. We live in a lousy world of greed and that greed causes nations to turn their heads to tyrant leaders. } Greed comes in different forms and it is not all oil.
anonymous 1 July 2009 - 4:59am
Hiram, saddam was a muslim and so are iraqis! Geert only want to deport them, but your country is killing them!!!
Steve 1 July 2009 - 7:29pm
"OIL!" seems to be the favored cry by most Europeans. How is it we did not confiscate the oil fields there if this was our intent? Also, oil production from Iraq DECREASED dramatically immediately after the invasion. So through the use of common sense this was clearly not an oil issue. As Hiram stated, France was hugely opposed to the war due to economic reasons. They would look the other way when all of Saddam's atrocities were brought to light as long as the checks continued rolling in. What would you expect from a country who has its largest airport named after a known Nazi supporter who oversaw quarantining and shipping off countless Jews to their deaths? I do not think it was our place to go to war in Iraq (Afghanistan is a different story) but ignoring the human rights abuses of Saddam is very childish and naive.
Steve 1 July 2009 - 7:17pm
"OIL!" seems to be the favored cry by most Europeans. How is it we did not confiscate the oil fields there if this was our intent? Also, oil production from Iraq DECREASED
Anonymous 30 June 2009 - 3:42pm
We the usa started this lousy war over oil.Now China is putting in a bid to buy those oil fields.What happened to over 4000 U.S service people who lost their lives for that country. Now here comes China.What a lousy world we live in. alex

Post new comment

Please be reminded all comments must be in English, short and to the point - guideline 250 words. Abusive and inappropriate comments will be removed.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Video highlights

Homs: where is the UN?
The citizens of Homs in Syria are under attack and are asking the UN for...
In from Holland
On this week's show: winter weather takes hold of the country, we find out...

RNW on Facebook

Sign up for our newsletters

Email news bulletin

What's on - Programme Preview

Press Review - of the leading Dutch newspapers every weekday

Media Network

Euro Hit 40 - Europe's No. 1 chart show

RNW - News and analysis from the Netherlands in 10 languages, worldwide 24/7 on radio, television and online