Radio Netherlands Worldwide

SSO Login

More login possibilities:

Close
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
Home
Tuesday 21 October  
Ali Ali Qasim Alsaidi's Facebook page
Judith Spiegel's picture
Map
Sana'a, Yemen
Sana'a, Yemen

"Repent or die" in Yemen

Published on : 21 December 2012 - 3:21pm | By Judith Spiegel (Photo: RNW)
More about:

Ali Ali Qasim Alsaidi felt Yemen and its people were drifting away from Islam as it was meant to be. He wrote his findings – substantiated by Qu’ranic readings – on Facebook. And he’s now accused of apostasy, facing death penalty.
 
It is early the morning when Ali Ali Qasim Alsaidi (43) drives to the Press and Publications Court in Yemen’s capital Sana’a. Dressed in a brown suit, he steers his old Mercedes through the quiet streets of the city. People here are oblivious to the Kafka-like trial Alsaidi will be facing in an hour or so.
 
“It’s sorry or die”, he says. He means that in order for him to be cleared of the apostasy accusation, he has to repent. But he finds this difficult. “The things I wrote on Facebook were the result of research and are religiously correct”, says Alsaidi. He also felt it was his duty to write them down.
 
Galileo of Yemen
Alsaidi is the general director for budget and planning at the Yemeni Higher Judicial Council Secretariat. It was his colleagues who allegedly reported him to the prosecutor’s office. His lawyer Amin Hajar says that Alsaidi’s colleagues did so because they wanted his job. According to Hajar, “they have turned him into the Galileo of Yemen, only 500 years later.”
 
“Religion in this country is going this way”, Alsaidi points to the right, “and the people are going that way”, he points to the left. This is what he tried to make clear in his Facebook posts, most of which he published in the spring of 2011, when there was heavy fighting between government troops and the tribesmen of Hameed al Ahmar in the Al Hasaba district.
 
Taboo on discussing religion
“In this country you can discuss everything except religion”, says Alsaidi. And indeed, there is hardly any subject Yemenis do not discuss daily and at great length during their qat sessions, but religion is hardly ever one of them. “Nobody has read the Qu’ran. People just listen to all kinds of sheikhs.” In his Facebook posts he emphasises the importance of using reason as a means of finding the truth in religious matters.
 
For this, Alsaidi now stands trial in the Press and Publications Court. There’s a crowd in front of the entrance to the building, where many of Alsaidi’s family, friends and neighbours have gathered. They all believe in his innocence and are annoyed by the affair. “This country doesn’t know what freedom means, and Islah (Yemen’s equivalent to the Brotherhood) is making it worse”, they say angrily.
 
Article 259
The specialised Press and Publications Court was established in 2009. Many people believe its sole purpose is to silence Yemen’s few independent media outlets. Apparently it is now also being used to silence bloggers and Facebook users. It is questionable whether this court has the authority to do so, which is one of the arguments Alsaidi’s defence lawyers will be using. But then again, if not this court, there’s probably another one in Yemen.
 
A more important line of defence is that nothing Alsaidi wrote is against Islam and thus in violation of Article 259 of the Yemeni criminal code which states that “anyone who turns back from or denounces the religion of Islam, will receive the death penalty after being asked to repent three times and after having received a respite of thirty days.’
 
Eliminating apostates 
Alsaidi didn’t denounce religion, argues his defence team. Or as the Yemeni journalist Hind Aleryani wrote in her blog: “there is nothing in Alsaidi’s writings that shows he is an unbeliever.’ Support came from other sources as well. Most of them are afraid that if this case succeeds, the apostasy article might be politically (ab)used to get rid of people.
 
But the media and lawyers aren’t raising the even more fundamental question, at least from a Western perspective, about whether there may be something wrong with the article itself. What if Alsaidi or anyone else were an unbeliever? Should the state have the right to punish people for denouncing their religion?
 
Religious conservatives
“Of course”, responds a schoolteacher who lives not far from the court and wishes to remain anonymous. “This is an Islamic country, and Islam is clear about everything. There is no need for people to voice their opinions about it. And if he truly is an apostate, he should be punished.’
 
Which is exactly what Alsaidi’s family and friends are afraid of. “It is not only the court that could punish Ali. Any crazy person who considers him a kafir [unbeliever] might also decide to kill him”, they say. They stroke their chins, referring to men with beards.
 
"Repent or die"  
Then it is time to go inside the courtroom. The hearing doesn’t take long. Alsaidi’s defence team repeat what they’ve said before: their client should not be here. The prosecutor repeats what he said before: Alsaidi is an apostate. The judge says Alsaidi’s defence team should come up with a better defence, next week, same time, same place.
 

Back in the car Alsaidi is disappointed. This is not good. “Nothing changed. They are delaying the case because they want me to repent, but how can I? I am afraid I will first lose my job, then my wife [under Yemeni law a Yemeni wife cannot be married to an (alleged) unbeliever] and then my life.”   

Discussion

saqib 1 January 2013 - 7:19pm / UK

I don't know what he said but highly doubt it was against Islam. Allama Iqbal said things scholars rejected as unislamic. Even today visionaries like Javed Ghamidi are exiled from home countries due to their interpretation. I wish big Islamic scholars/philosophers (tariq ramadhan, abdul hakim murad etc)would come out and argue peoples cases that is not apostasy but interpretation of Islam.

Real good moslim 28 December 2012 - 10:27am

This comment has been deleted because of abusive language

Anonymous 23 December 2012 - 10:42am / USA

The court say he is an apostate. What is he wasting his time trying to fight this? In good faith can use kitman. No Muslim could pass the scrutiny of a Sharia Court without kitman. Bounce an idea off of the system. If that leads to the apostate verdict you have the get out of jail free card. Repent (Lie) and live. You think a life governed by personal interpretation of the Koran can pass muster? A good Muslim is whatever the hack of the moment says it is. Repent (lie) and move on. Seeking justice under Sharia Law is a fool's errand. Allah will judge you in the end. Why would you put your life in the hands of a mortal?You think the rightly guided judge exists in this world? A moment of reflection. Let's be honest with yourself about this. What has your experience to date revealed in this regard? Your co-workers want your job and your head. How is that treat fellow Muslims with respect working out for you? Pointing your finger at the corrupt is a waste of energy if there is no accountability in this world. Maybe this whole Sharia Thing is bogus...if it can be abused by sinful men then who's hand governs it?

Anonymous 23 December 2012 - 8:51am / USA

To an atheist, religionists and religion are indicators that our species in unworthy of sustained biological survival. Only when thought trumps belief will we be worthy, and religionists will not permit this. We are allowing willed ignorance to kill us with birthrate, as religionists cheer on procreation as if it were a horse race.

Bob Smith 22 December 2012 - 5:42pm / USA

Islam is nothing more than unseen chains. The article describes this quite well.

If you cannot talk about “something”, that “something” is broken. And Islam is the problem.

Why can’t Islam take any criticism? Surely some parts of Islam are incorrect. Do you believe that drinking camel urine is a medical cure? Do you believe that 54 year old men should have sex with 9 year old girls?

Until Muslims create an Islam that allows critical thinking, all of Islam is nothing more than an intellectual straight jacket.

Post new comment

Please be reminded all comments must be in English, short and to the point - guideline 250 words. Abusive and inappropriate comments will be removed.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

RNW on Facebook

RNW Player

Video highlights

Ladies on the move
RNW is keen on featuring inspiring women in our target countries, women who...
What about men?
In many countries, men don't stick around to raise their children. This is...