Radio Netherlands Worldwide

SSO Login

More login possibilities:

Close
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
Home
Monday 13 February RNW - NEWS AND ANALYSIS FROM THE NETHERLANDS IN 10 LANGUAGES, WORLDWIDE 24/7 ON RADIO, TV AND ONLINE
Oil outweighs environment in Canada's 'Paradise Lost'
RNW English section's picture
Map
Ottawa, Canada
Ottawa, Canada

Oil outweighs environment in Canada's 'Paradise Lost'

Published on : 15 December 2009 - 3:43pm | By RNW English section
More about:

The clichéd image of Canada is a land of pristine lakes, snow capped mountains and thousands of kilometres of untouched forests - an environmental paradise. But that image has been tarnished significantly over the past several years. And when Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper joins the talks at the Copenhagen climate summit he can expect some tough criticism of his government's environmental policies.

By Dan Karpenchuck in Toronto

Shortly after Stephen Harper and his minority Conservative government came to power in 2006, Mr Harper pulled Canada out of the Kyoto Protocol, saying it was not a workable, realistic solution to cutting greenhouse gases. Under Kyoto, the previous Liberal government pledged to cut emissions by six percent from 1990 levels by 2012. Mr Harper has committed to reduce emissions by 20 percent from 2006 levels by 2020. Not enough, according to Canadian activists.

George Monbiot is a British columnist and environmentalist. He says Canada is not pulling its weight in the fight against climate change.

"Climate change is doing to Canada's international image what whaling has done to Japan's. I think it's fair to say that the Harper government has done more than any other nation to deliberately try to frustrate and sabotage the discussions towards a climate agreement so far. So much so that at one of the meetings in Bangkok, almost all the developing world delegates walked out when the Canadian delegate was speaking because they were so outraged by the position he was taking."

World's dirtiest oil
Another major issue with environmentalists in Canada and abroad is the development of the Alberta Tar Sands, described as producing some of the dirtiest oil in the world. The project is the world's single largest emitter of CO2. An independent study released two weeks ago suggests pollution from the oil sands is nearly five times greater and twice as widespread as the industry claims. The study says toxic emissions from the tar sands are equal to a major oil spill every year.

 
And it's not just the environment that's suffering. The country's First Nations communities have brought thee major lawsuits over concerns about how the oil sands may be affecting Canada's native population in the region. George Poitras is a former chief of the Mikisew Cree in northern Alberta and says 'dirty oil' is killing his people:

"Many of the contaminants that we're finding in the water systems including mercury, arsenic and polycyclic aeromatic hydrocarbons combined, we know that they contribute to the types of cancers that we're observing. Very rare cancers and cancers that this year have been confirmed by the Alberta Cancer Board."

Tied to Washington
Environment minister Jim Prentice recently announced that Ottawa's policy for cutting greenhouse gas emissions would mirror that of Washington's. He said the economies of the two countries are so linked that their essential environmental targets also remain in line. Failure to harmonize the targets would mean a loss of investments and jobs to the USA, according to Mr Prentice.

Many Canadians are also concerned about Canada's international image on the climate change issue. Andrew Nikiforuk is the author of a book called Tar Sands - Dirty Oil and the Future of a Continent. He says Canada's position on climate change at this point is much closer to Saudi Arabia's than it is to most European countries.

"We're coming into the summit without a real plan.....without a real policy, we're one of the few industrial countries in the world with no strategic energy plan, no strategic climate action plan.....no strategic renewable energy plan. And essentially our policy is this: we'll have what the Americans are having. And so we're really waiting for the Americans to unveil some kind of program. And we'll say ....yeah, we think that might be a good idea."


No agreement
Even provincial governments within Canada can't seem to agree on a single climate change policy. Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia have put forward their own emissions targets - tougher than Ottawa's and at odds with oil-producing Alberta and Saskatchewan. Any attempt by the federal government to impose national targets to cut emissions will spark fierce political debate across the country, putting national unity at stake.

But Canada does have a role to play at Copenhagen, and Prime Minister Harper will be under intense scrutiny when he speaks. Activists want him to base the country's climate plan on what the science suggests is necessary, despite the cost.
 

Lead photo: Pipes for the Alberta Tar Sands (loozrboy/Flickr)
 

Most popular news in this dossier

Houseboat on dry river bed

2011 weather: warm and weird

The past year has been the third warmest in the Netherlands since record taking began in 1901, with an...

Discussion

Steve 16 December 2009 - 4:36pm / USA
This article fails to mention that the Oil Sands extraction equipment is getting retrofitted with devices to capture CO2, and the air quality was better than all the North American cities tested under the Alberta Clean Air Strategic Alliance. The first reclaimed land was certified not long ago, it is called Gateway Hill. This method of oil extraction has the potential to be very dirty, but with strict oversight it seems to be progressing safely, and reclamation seems to be moving along smoothly.
Arev Beilttog 15 December 2009 - 8:55pm / Germany
As a Canadian I am rather ashamed of Canada's present government and its total disrespect for the environment. Oil extracted from the Tar Sands goes directly to the US, while Eastern Canada has to import up to 40% oil to keep cars running. Sadly and hard to understand, under the NAFTA (North American Free Trade) treaty, Canada commits to always supply the US with 60% of oil and gas, regardless of Canada's needs. Would love to meet the idiots who fell for this American ruse.

Post new comment

Please be reminded all comments must be in English, short and to the point - guideline 250 words. Abusive and inappropriate comments will be removed.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Video highlights

Homs: where is the UN?
The citizens of Homs in Syria are under attack and are asking the UN for...
In from Holland
On this week's show: winter weather takes hold of the country, we find out...

RNW on Facebook

Sign up for our newsletters

Email news bulletin

What's on - Programme Preview

Press Review - of the leading Dutch newspapers every weekday

Media Network

Euro Hit 40 - Europe's No. 1 chart show

RNW - News and analysis from the Netherlands in 10 languages, worldwide 24/7 on radio, television and online