Radio Netherlands Worldwide

SSO Login

More login possibilities:

Close
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
Home
Monday 13 February RNW - NEWS AND ANALYSIS FROM THE NETHERLANDS IN 10 LANGUAGES, WORLDWIDE 24/7 ON RADIO, TV AND ONLINE
Geert Wilders
Radio Netherlands Worldwide's picture
Map
Hilversum, Netherlands
Hilversum, Netherlands

Moroccan biscuits for Wilders - a video report

Published on : 10 July 2009 - 10:30am | By RNW Radio Netherlands Worldwide
More about:

"In my opinion, you have nothing to fear," Geert Wilders tells RNW journalist Mohamed Amezian, a Dutch Muslim of Moroccan descent. Mr Amezian has found himself interviewing the politician who makes The Hague nervous, who has declared war on Islam and who wants to deport 'criminal foreigners'.
 
Just back from Morocco where I was following local elections, I hear from Danny – our hyperactive intern – that he is going to interview Mr Wilders for RNW’s Arabic department. "Well done," I tell him. But an interview with Geert Wilders is asking perhaps too much of an intern.
 

“If I were to interview him, what would I want to ask?” I wonder. “Would I dare tell him that his crusade against Islam is counterproductive and only instigates more fundamentalism?

 

Mixed Feelings
I see Danny walking down the corridor with a broad smile on his face. Interim-editor-in-chief Chaalan Charif often walks with us. He wants to briefly consult with Danny and me. "You’re going to interview him," Mr Charif tells me. "But I’m on-air tomorrow," I respond with mixed emotions. "That’ll be arranged," he says. “But do you want to do it?”

An interview with Geert Wilders calls for solid preparation. Questions race through my mind. I receive the necessary documentation via email – more than 30 pages.

 

Headscarf

I’ve forgotten who suggested it, but the idea to bring 'something' for Mr Wilders is brilliant. But what? Someone says Moroccan biscuits. I ring my wife to ask if she wouldn't mind baking some biscuits for Geert Wilders. Yeah right. My wife wears a headscarf. And I'm well aware of her opinion of 'that hate-monger'. Is she going to bake something for him?

It’s Thursday morning. I’m sitting at my computer, thinking of a suitable opening question. Preferably something personal. For example: do you have Moroccan friends? Are you even capable of making Moroccan friends? How do you get along with your bodyguards? More personal than just politics, in any case.

Finally, with the help of my colleagues, I’ve come up with a list of questions. On the way to The Hague I ask myself, will he really accept my offer of biscuits?

 

Last check

Black chairs and nailed-down tables furnish a room in the Dutch parliament building. "Mr Wilders is going to sit here," one of his colleagues tells us. Danny does a last check. It’s already past four. "It’s a busy day today, it’s going to take awhile," the press officer says.

At a quarter to five I wonder if he's going to show. Stay calm. "Don’t let them get to you," was my colleague's advice. But I'm starting to wonder if the interview will still take place, especially when the press officer receives a phone call and quickly leaves the room. Silence.

 

Handshake

A bodyguard opens the door and briefly inspects the room. Geert Wilders walks in. Smiling. We shake hands. Two bodyguards and a police officer take their places.
 

"Where shall I sit?" Mr Wilders asks in a friendly tone. I give him a chair.
"May I offer you something, Mr Wilders? Moroccan biscuits?"
He hesitates but answers "Sure."
"Can we film that?"
"No! Definitely not."
"Okay. We won't."
"What’s in it?" he asks pointing to the tin.
"See for yourself."
"Hmm. They look good."

The man who dictates the Dutch political agenda, particularly when it comes to integration and immigration policies, is sitting right in front of me. He is known in the Arabic world as a 'Muslim hater', 'hate monger' and as a 'racist'. His strong bond with Israel only confirms the 'rumours' in the Islamic world that a global conspiracy exists against Islam.

 

Muslim moderates

I must say that his viewpoints are more than clear. According to him there is no such thing as moderate Islam. "There are those who call themselves Muslim moderates. But I don’t believe in a moderate Islam. I think the Islamic belief is a totalitarian ideology," he tirelessly repeats.

He doesn’t come across as hostile. On the contrary, he's even friendly. He listens attentively to my questions and gives me 'standard' answers. It feels a bit like déjà vu.

There is one question, however, which I'm too afraid to ask. Why won't he accept the biscuits – the ones my wife baked for him – on film?

Related articles

Discussion

Edward A 14 August 2010 - 8:33pm / USA

with all my respect to you Hiram I can t deny that I am smelling Zionism in your linty comments. Try to get out of your own subjectivity and maybe you will do better as a critic.

inchirierimasini 23 July 2009 - 11:16pm
Hiram but in my opinion we owe a lot to the dutch which brought remote goods in Europe from far, like plant seeds and others, which enabled our isle of culture to grow and think today about the importance of democracy and independency. Allessandra Masini CEO Bucharest http://www.rentcar.ro
Brian Foulkrod 19 July 2009 - 4:24pm
Considering the Netherlands' history as an open society dating back to taking in Jews and Muslims escaping the Spanish inquisition, and hiding Jews from the Nazis, it rakes me as offensive to that nation and all friends I made in the years living there to insinuate they "hate Israel". Disagreeing with the policies of a government do not equate to hatred of a nation. I have been tagged both anti-semetic any time I question Israeli policy, and a "typical American Iran hater" for questioning their policies. I even get called "anti-American" if I dare to question U.S. policies. The extremists will always dehumanize and label their "enemies", and just like KKK supporters would call me a "race traitor" for saying they're wrong, every type of extremist will label the reporter in this piece (or any other who disagrees) as being the racist they pretend not to be.. I lived in a neighborhood that was partially Moroccan, and after 9/11 until I returned to the U.S., they (like all my neighbors) flew the Dutch flag (with the Orange sash) and a U.S. flag every day, asking if I had any news or if anybody I knew was killed in the attacks, knowing I had family in Pennsylvania where the last plane crashed. Judging all Muslims (or any group) on the actions of the extremists would be like all Dutch treating me as the "arrogant American", or viewing all Dutch on the basis of one man gone mad and crashing a car through the crowd on Koninnegdag. My biggest complaint about this enemy to reason and humanity does lie with the Dutch though, just as I've been angry at Americans over Bush Jr. When under 40% show up at the polls, you give an extremist a chance to get in, as his rabid dog supporters show up in full force at the pools. Do the math: 16.9% of 39% comes to around 6% of the population,but voter apathy has given this man a soapbox. Hitler started out small too... Next time, show up en masse at the polls and take back your voice.
Hiram 19 July 2009 - 11:06pm
Brian Foulkrod, the Dutch were one of the first if not the first to get involved with the slave trade and they also notified the Nazis when they knew of the hiding places of the Jewish people. They did it for greed and other reasons known only to them and maybe even for their Christian faith; but, the terrorists and specific Islamic nations today do in the name of Islam. Now all Muslims are not terrorists but when thousands of terrorists acts are committed in the name of Islam, people become nervous about anyone who states he is a Muslim. Why do they become nervous? One reason is the modus operandi of the terrorists acts and there are a few distinct patterns and one is: "The terrorism was done in the name of Islam and Islam has declared Jihad against the Crusader nations." Now we know that all Muslims are not terrorists but people, if they are concerned about the terrorism, have a right to look at the evidence, which there is plenty, and determine humanity is in dire danger. { As to Wilders he has a right and obligation to the Dutch people to be concerned about Islam and it's dangers. Where Wilders goes wrong is in his believe that all Muslims be deported (If that is what he stated. After reading some RNW reports, I find some reports just might be biased against him on the deportation part.) {As to Bush, he did take the war to the terrorists and he didn't do it for the oil.
Anonymous 14 July 2009 - 6:13pm
Serenely full, the epicure would say, fate cannot harm me, I have eaten biscuits today.
Anonymous 14 July 2009 - 6:09pm
Tell me what you eat, and I will tell you what you are.
Anonymous 13 July 2009 - 6:10pm
As to the biscuits, I would like to say that the gratitude of most men is nothing but a secret desire to receive greater benefits.
Alan 12 July 2009 - 7:51pm
I'm from the UK, and I'm struggling to follow this Dutch politics stuff - is this Geert Wilders bloke a main player in Europe, because he always seems to be in your news?
Anonymous 13 July 2009 - 6:06pm
Mr. Wilders is not a main player, but just a minor nuisance.
cole 12 July 2009 - 5:41pm
If you are Muslim the aim is to bring everyone under Islam ~ it is a process Muslims think they have considered but they have likely considered only within the restrictions placed on them by Islam - and that is to face or risk facing severe punishment for any criticism of Islam or the Prophet. If the west were to take on Islamic law it would mean we would have to bar people from leaving Islam - we would then have to forcibly convert children whose fathers convert - and like Egypt and Morocco imprison those who refuse to follow Islam - who have been deemed by the state to be Muslim. Muslim men would be free to marry into any group - but all non-Muslim men - would either have to become Muslim first - to marry outside of the group - or marry 'strictly' within their non-Muslim group. It is clearly written in the Koran - that although there is no compulsion to join - non-Muslims living among Muslims - must be subjugated and willingly pay the jizya tax - or face war or death. In the past the Jizya tax was widely used (In India it became more profitable for Islamic rulers to collect the jizya from Hindus - rather than rule over Muslims who paid none - so forced conversions were therefore less desirable - but 80 million Hindus /Buddhist died in the Islamic conquest) - now few countries require non-Muslims to pay the protection tax - under the Pakistan Taliban - Hindus, Sikhs and Hindus - all indigenous people - have been asked to pay high amounts to ensure their safety - and protection from Muslim attacks - while living among Muslims. Don't forget Hindu women wear headscarves in their traditional dress - headscarves are a poor argument - but where Shari'a law in places like Egypt is used - Christians cannot build new churches or need special permission to repair old ones - the aim being to eventually create a pure Islamic state - the eradication of all non-Muslim - and they have did a pretty good job so far - Copts are now 10% and shrinking. Islamic law gives priority to Muslims over all others - in Egypt a Christian cannot present evidence against a Muslim - and two Muslim women are needed for every Muslim man in an Islamic court - under Shari'a Muslim women have 1/3 rights as men - and likewise non-Muslim men have less rights than Muslim men. And this is the tip of the iceberg for this law. It is okay for a Muslim to say - I'm a good person - I'm contributing - but to ask us to overturn our systems of law to replace them with laws that give supremacy to the Islamic belief system and Muslims over all others - goes way past asking for equal rights - and Wilders is absolutely right to oppose this challenge to our rights and freedoms that are the cornerstone of life and prosperity in free Europe.
Thomas - USA 11 July 2009 - 4:42pm
In the light of French Pres. Sarkozy infamous speech according which - "Islam is progress, science, finesse, modernity, Arabic language is the future... and that fanaticism in the name of Islam is a corruption of Islam." - Dutch Muslims will find warm welcome in France - not to mention Britain - so the Islamisation of Eurabia is assured; - so don't give up. Having multiple wives can help in speeding up the creation of the "Ummah Wahida" (Unified Islamic world.)
Anonymous 13 July 2009 - 3:28pm
Having multiples wives can be a nightmare and a pain in the neck.Only one might be enough to make a laughing stock out of you.
Anonymous 14 July 2009 - 6:16pm
Having multiple wives can be a nightmare and a pain in the neck and the back, one wife might be enough to make a laughing stock out of you
Karen 10 July 2009 - 9:56pm
I love how people keep missing the points that Wilders, and those with common sense that agree with him, are trying to make. The problem isn't the Islamic faith itself, per se. It is the inability of many of those of that faith to become part of the societies that they move into that is the problem. Let's take the example of clothes. In my Opinion, I could care less if a woman wears a Burka, a hijab, or a wig for modesty, or nothing to cover her head at all other than basic decency minimums. However, what she wears or doesn't wear should conform to three things: 1)that what she wears is by choice and she will not be beaten, killed, or otherwise punished for refusal to wear it. 2) that it conforms to local laws. 3) That she will do what is necessary to be identified whenever an ID is needed. Let's take on Laws. If someone wants to hold themselves to a higher moral code then that of their country of residence, by all means feel free. However, they are expected to know and follow all the laws of the place that they reside, and are accountable to the consequences of breaking those laws. That means Sharia law can be used as a guideline for their own living if they wish, but the only legal authority is the country, not the religious, and Sharia sentences cannot be pronounced and/or carried out when in conflict with those laws. In addition, anyone who carries out a consequence/punishment from Sharia when it is in conflict with the laws of the land can and should be prosecuted, and "religious freedom" is not a valid excuse. Before this gets too much longer, lets make it simple. ANYONE, from ANYWHERE, who comes and fits themselves into the society they are moving into is welcome. ANYONE, from ANYWHERE, who comes and refuses to fit themselves into the society, especially in ways that run afoul of that countries laws, is welcome to leave for somewhere where their behavior is a better fit.
Anonymous 13 July 2009 - 7:30pm
All women's dresses, in every age and country, are merely variations on the eternal struggle between the admitted desire to dress and the unadmitted desire to undress.
Hiram 10 July 2009 - 11:03am
"According to him there is no such thing as moderate Islam. "There are those who call themselves Muslim moderates. But I don’t believe in a moderate Islam. I think the Islamic belief is a totalitarian ideology," he tirelessly repeats."...This article reflects some truth in Wilders' belief in moderate Islam but it doesn't confirm it. The report does give a reflection of the reporter's belief sytem that a "global conspiracy" is taking place against Islam. He uses Wilders "strong bond" towards Israel as confirmation of the conspiracy. When a person makes a claim, more especially a journalist, by stating a strong bond between a person and a nation equals (confirms) a global conspiracy and no evidence is presented , it reflects the mindset of the person. { This reporter had a great opportutunity to ask Wilders some serious questions but failed to do so. Why? His lead story " Moroccan biscuits for Wilders - a video report" isn't the important news. Is the "Moroccan biscuits" a newsworthy subject? I wouldn't think so. The reporter failed to do his research and ask pertinent questions; therfore, he fail back on a trival subject of "Moroccan biscuits". Mr. Amezian, you were given a great opportunity to ask good, solid questions. I doubt Mr. Wilders will give you another chance. Why? You showed bias towards him by making a general accusation against him and you showed no proof.
Anonymous 13 July 2009 - 10:11pm
An improper mind(set) is a perpetual feast.
Anon 11 July 2009 - 5:13pm
I hear'm but I don't believe'm.
Anonymous 13 July 2009 - 7:36pm
Nothing is so firmly believed as that which we least know.
anonymous 10 July 2009 - 2:49am
The only jew the RNW loves is Anne Frank, but would have never mentioned her, had she been an Israeli!
Hiram 9 July 2009 - 11:13pm
Mr. Amezian, you stated "He is known in the Arabic world as a 'Muslim hater', 'hate monger' and as a 'racist'. His strong bond with Israel only confirms the 'rumours' in the Islamic world that a global conspiracy exists against Islam." I asked a question about your statement on a previous article, dated the 8th of July, and never got a response. {In reality, I never expected one but because the page no longer exists (removed from RNW because my bookmark stated 'The page you requested was not found.' ) I came to the conclusion, your report was biased because your statement that Wilders strong bond with Israel confirmed the rumours in the Islamic world that a global conspiracy exists against Islam. Again, I would like to ask the question "How does Wilders strong Bond with Israel confirm the rumours of a global conspiracy against Islam? You made a news report on Wilders and you told the world that Wilders strong bond with Israel confirmed a global conspiracy against Islam and you presented no evidence. Your style of writing news reports is biased and it was confirmed when the original titled was changed to read "Moroccan biscuits for Wilders - a video report." The video report was added and the previous report no longer exists. Also there was one other person who made a statement about the article. P.S. Reporters should write the facts and they should support their reports with evidence. Is RNW biased against Israel?
Steve 10 July 2009 - 2:20pm
Every European news source is biased. The unilateral anti-Israel propaganda was born out of the oil embargo. The Euro-Arab Dialogue and the Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation were founded. Both called for a unilateral stance against Israel and America in return for access to Arab markets and the promise to keep oil flowing to the European continent. Eventually they called for European Universities to teach a "favorable" view of Arab language and culture. They also called for more "favorable" press coverage on Arabs and their causes, i.e. anti-Israel. For anyone who disagrees take a class in a European university or read a mainstream European newspaper. You will find only one side of the Middle East crisis reported/taught regardless of country or medium.
anonymous 10 July 2009 - 2:40am
Ofcourse, they are biased, they even won a gold medal for reporting against Israel.RNW doesn't like Israel a bit, they would love Gazans to beat Israel and will never write about it.

Post new comment

Please be reminded all comments must be in English, short and to the point - guideline 250 words. Abusive and inappropriate comments will be removed.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Video highlights

Homs: where is the UN?
The citizens of Homs in Syria are under attack and are asking the UN for...
In from Holland
On this week's show: winter weather takes hold of the country, we find out...

RNW on Facebook

Sign up for our newsletters

Email news bulletin

What's on - Programme Preview

Press Review - of the leading Dutch newspapers every weekday

Media Network

Euro Hit 40 - Europe's No. 1 chart show

RNW - News and analysis from the Netherlands in 10 languages, worldwide 24/7 on radio, television and online