Radio Netherlands Worldwide

SSO Login

More login possibilities:

Close
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
Home
Friday 1 August  
Miffy
Jannie Schipper's picture
Map
Utrecht, Netherlands
Utrecht, Netherlands

Miffy cracks down on copyright infringements

Published on : 4 September 2011 - 7:55am | By Jannie Schipper (Photo: Rechtspraak.nl/Herman Roggeveen/ER Productions)
More about:

Apart from being a sweet little rabbit, Miffy is also big bucks. There are plenty of people who would love to cash in on the commercial success. Dutch publisher Mercis has been jealously guarding the copyright on Miffy and her friends since 1971 – if need be, with the gloves off.

“Illustration removed at the request of lawyers representing Mercis BV.” The internet is full of spaces vacated by Miffy pictures. Mercis is notoriously tough when it comes to protecting the copyright on Dick Bruna’s cross-nosed rabbit.

Miffy books in a multitude of languages
Miffy books in many languages
“Big companies like Mercis intimidate private individuals,” says Henkjan de Krijger of domain administrator Punt.nl. Mercis took the Amsterdam company to court for posting a parody of Miffy. But the judge largely sided with Punt.nl. An appeal is pending.

Art director Mahmoud Abdou, one of the people behind the Arabic version of Miffy, agrees that Mercis takes its job as Miffy’s bodyguard seriously. “It sets very strict conditions, both for the images and the copyright payments.”

Shock
Mercis plays down its litigious reputation. “It’s not a hobby of ours,” says Mercis spokeswoman Marja Kerkhof. “In the past ten years, all in all we’ve filed three court cases.” Mercis won the first of them easily.

The second, against Japanese company Sanrio (“we’re David against Goliath,” says Ms Kerkhof) was recently settled out of court. Miffy and Kathy, Hello Kitty’s Miffy-lookalike friend, agreed that the legal costs could be better spent helping victims of the Japanese earthquake. The third court case is against Punt.nl.

Japanese Miffy products
Japanese Miffy products
“A lot of individuals can’t or daren’t let it get as far as a court case,” argues Henkjan de Krijger. “A teenager who gets a strongly-worded letter from a lawyer gets the shock of his life. But unlike many private individuals, as a company we can take on a case like this.” Even the Dutch shock blog GeenStijl – not renowned for its scruples – hurriedly took down a picture of a fake Miffy snorting cocaine, in response to a tough-talking letter from Mercis.

“It’s true we’re very alert to it,” says Marja Kerkhof of Mercis. “We have to be. Miffy is a very accessible figure that people can easily copy.” She stresses that cases where commercial interests are at stake (as with the Japanese firm Sanrio) are fundamentally different from conflicts about parodies of Miffy. “With parodies it’s about the limits of freedom of expression.”

The cat and the rabbit
Illustrator Dick Bruna and Mercis insist that their main issue is “respect for the world of the child”. This is why they object so much to parodies they see as harmful to Miffy’s child-friendly image. Miffy taking drugs, Miffy having sex with a pig, Miffy as Hitler, Miffy in a plane heading for the twin towers. It all provides plenty of work for the legal eagles at Mercis.

Yet notably there’s never been a court case between Mercis and ER Productions, worldwide distributor of films and toys featuring the Belgian cat Musti. The cat and the rabbit have been quarrelling for years over which of them came first. Miffy was officially born in 1955, Musti in 1969. But Musti’s creator Ray Goossens has always said he first drew the figure back in the 1940s, says ER productions.

ER Productions is currently negotiating a licence to distribute Musti dolls across the border in the Netherlands, birthplace of Miffy. So at last the cat and the rabbit will be able to play together nicely. Or scratch each other’s eyes out.

(mb/imm)

Copyright notice: Top photo © Rechtspraak.nl/Herman Roggeveen/ER Productions

 

Discussion

SH 7 September 2011 - 5:58am / Japan

I agree with Mercis person's comment, saying that "cases where commercial interests are at stake are fundamentally different from conflicts about parodies of Miffy". Image, not of graphical one, but rather of stories behind the character, is important.

When it comes to commercial interest, it is unproductive to keep conflicts over which is the first. Miffy, Misti, Kitty and Kathy... given their abstract drawings from rabbit or cat, it is not surprising to look similar. Stories behind them are more important. That's why we call them CHARACTER, not just FIGURE.

SH 7 September 2011 - 5:58am / Japan

I agree with Mercis person's comment, saying that "cases where commercial interests are at stake are fundamentally different from conflicts about parodies of Miffy". Image, not of graphical one, but rather of stories behind the character, is important.

When it comes to commercial interest, it is unproductive to keep conflicts over which is the first. Miffy, Misti, Kitty and Kathy... given their abstract drawings from rabbit or cat, it is not surprising to look similar. Stories behind them are more important. That's why we call them CHARACTER, not just FIGURE.

Post new comment

Please be reminded all comments must be in English, short and to the point - guideline 250 words. Abusive and inappropriate comments will be removed.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

RNW on Facebook

RNW Player

Video highlights

Ladies on the move
RNW is keen on featuring inspiring women in our target countries, women who...
What about men?
In many countries, men don't stick around to raise their children. This is...