Radio Netherlands Worldwide

SSO Login

More login possibilities:

Close
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
Home
Saturday 26 May RNW - NEWS AND ANALYSIS FROM THE NETHERLANDS IN 10 LANGUAGES, WORLDWIDE 24/7 ON RADIO, TV AND ONLINE
Copyright
Robert Chesal's picture
Map
The Hague, Netherlands
The Hague, Netherlands

Loosen up copyright law, says Dutch government

Published on : 13 February 2012 - 11:03am | By Robert Chesal (Composite: RNW)
More about:

The YouTube generation has gained an ally in the worldwide "copyright wars." The Dutch government wants to change copyright law so new media users can continue to do "creative remixes" of protected content. The Hague will no longer wait for the European Commission to find a compromise.
 
"We all love YouTube," says Bernt Hugenholtz of the Dutch state committee on copyright law.

"Many of the videos we find there are creative remixes of material protected under copyright. They're mostly for laughs or political commentary, or they're simply absurd. If we applied the law today strictly, we would not be allowed to do these things." 
 
Thin ice
Hugenholtz says European copyright law is outdated because the exceptions it allows for the use of protected content do not take new technology into account. This also affects university lecturers like himself who can use copyright-protected material in their lectures but find themselves on thin ice once they start showing the same content via digital technology such as electronic whiteboards.

US vs. European copyright law: the pros and cons

Fair use is a doctrine in American copyright law that permits limited use of copyrighted material without acquiring permission from the rights holders.

Examples of fair use include commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship. The norm is broadly defined, leaving the courts far-reaching discretion in judging cases of copyright infringement.

By contrast, European law favours predictability by strictly defining a specific set of exceptions and limitations to copyright protection. No leeway is given to the courts to interpret these.

Critics say the European rules are unsuited to deal with the rapid pace of development in new digital technology. They also believe the current EU rules, if strictly applied, encroach upon fundamental freedoms of internet users, such as their right to privacy.
 

"Freedom is a good thing," he adds.

"We all agree that it's good for creativity, good for laughs, and no one gets hurt. Copyright holders are not harmed, so it makes a lot of sense to allow this. But in Europe, where we do not have open norms like the fair use doctrine in the United States, we can't do these things without infringing the law."

Relax the rules
Hugenholtz, copyright law professor at the University of Amsterdam, discussed his views last Friday with representatives of European governments, the entertainment industry, internet entrepreneurs, legal experts, journalists and librarians. They were gathered in The Hague for "Towards Flexible Copyright," a conference organised by the Dutch government.
 
At the conference, Deputy Justice Minister Fred Teeven said he is exploring "a more flexible system of copyright exceptions that would also work in a European context." Teeven's suggestion that the Dutch would unilaterally loosen their rules clearly displeased one of his guests: the head of the European Commission unit drafting a new directive to harmonise EU copyright law.
 
Big business
But the same idea was music to Marietje Schaake's ears. One of the leading voices in the European Parliament on internet freedom, Schaake asserts that decision-making on copyright law in Brussels is being stymied by vested interests in the entertainment and publishing industries.

We are not in the business of ensuring that certain big business models prevail and that fair competition cannot happen," she says.

"We must ensure that there is competition and a free market but we have to protect creativity as well. Right now the entertainment industry, for one, benefits from these outdated laws. These big parties will do all they can to prevent reform or redesign at all." 
 
New technology
Fred von Lohmann, chief copyright counsel for Google, points out that new technology and copyright have collided many times over the past century, "beginning with the player piano (self-playing piano), broadcast radio, broadcast television, cable TV, video recorders and so on." Each of these technologies was initially seen as a threat by copyright holders, he says, "but each eventually expanded the market, creating vastly more profits for a wider circle of people."
 
Therefore, Von Lohmann told attendees in The Hague, copyright holders should embrace new technologies rather than fearing them. And governments should introduce as much copyright flexibility as possible to allow creativity to flourish.
 
No creative crisis
"If you look at the motion picture industry, you see that they continue to enjoy very healthy revenues," the Google counsel says.

"On the other hand the music industry has struggled somewhat. But in the end there are more opportunities being created by these new technologies than ever before. There are more bands, using more different technologies to reach more fans than ever before. So there is certainly no crisis of creativity. There's more music, more video, more writing going on today than ever before."

Von Lohmann believes the time is ripe for individual governments in Europe to make their copyright laws future-proof. Unlike some who have called for a radical rethink of Europe's legislation, he believes there is enough room for manouevre to simply modify the current rules.
 

Recent articles

Most popular news in this dossier

Copyright

Loosen up copyright law, says Dutch government

The YouTube generation has gained an ally in the worldwide "copyright wars." The Dutch government...
British-Palestinian Muslim cleric Haitham al-Haddad

Cleric did say “Jews are descendants of apes and pigs”

“I will tell you the truth about the fight between us and Jews who are the enemies of God and the...
Marietje Schaake

Clinton and Rosenthal should practice what they preach

Almost a year ago, Mohammed Bouazizi set himself on fire, sparking the revolution in Tunisia. The transitions...
Radical Belgian Muslims disrupt meeting

Salafists disrupt liberal Islam debate in Amsterdam

Radical Belgian Muslims disrupted a debate on Wednesday evening about a liberal approach to Islam....
Firewall or brick wall: EU proposals erode internet freedoms

EU proposals erode internet freedoms

While Europeans were busily preparing for the festive season, Brussels quietly published a document that will...

Discussion

Anonymous 18 February 2012 - 8:11am

in short it means this :

1. you may not copy music. (obvious, but when doing a reality check. it isnt realistic.)

2. you may not use a song to remix it into something new. (thats becoming a problem)

3. you may not make new things that "look"/sound/whatever like another product.

4. it makes it easier to sue people without any decent proof. (an IP isnt a person, and a virus isnt an intention to do bad things), so even innocent people can be sued with proof of a simple IP in a log file.

5. it becomes easier to shut down anything that publishes copyrighted material (this means basically ANY website where users can freely upload files to. even youtube) conclusion : its impossible to protect creativity without limiting others on their creativity. and you are by default a highly potential downloader and makes its obvious for the judges to judge guilty by default (even if you're innocent, had a virus or someone else was on your pc). the US clearly speaks about "foreign thiefs", that makes me wonder... it does more damage to society, but has a great concentrated profit for the copyright holders (not the authors). so i would say "stop trying to protect something that cant be protected. it limits other's creativity for your entertainment. thats not what the entertainment industry was for."

Anonymous 14 February 2012 - 9:04pm / Sweden

This is amazing. All the best to the Netherlands. Lead the way and others emulate.

user avatar
Robert Chesal 14 February 2012 - 10:20pm

It may be too early to celebrate. I understand the Dutch government is still in favor of ACTA (although a majority of the Lower House of Parliament today delayed the signing of the treaty until it is tested against the Dutch constitution). And I'm told that Deputy Justice Minister Fred Teeven wants to ban filesharing. Looks like I need to write a follow-up!

Post new comment

Please be reminded all comments must be in English, short and to the point - guideline 250 words. Abusive and inappropriate comments will be removed.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Video highlights

Dutch beachcombers: a dying breed
Dutch beachcombers are a dying breed. In the past, objects would regularly...
Shell presented with "Oily Mary" cocktail from Niger Delta
Friends of the Earth Netherlands has offered "Oily Mary"...

RNW on Facebook

Sign up for our newsletters

Email news bulletin

What's on - Programme Preview

Press Review - of the leading Dutch newspapers every weekday

Media Network

Euro Hit 40 - Europe's No. 1 chart show

RNW - News and analysis from the Netherlands in 10 languages, worldwide 24/7 on radio, television and online