Greatest achievement: Establishment of the American Islamic Congress (AIC)
Controversial opinion: Muslims, who do not speak out against terror, are condoning it.
Loved by: The silent majority of moderate American Muslims.
Hated by: Hate preachers claiming to speak in the name of Islam
In the United States, freedom of expression is a fundamental right, guaranteed by the constitution. That’s great, of course, but when everyone’s free to speak their minds the quieter voices are sometimes drowned out by the radical shouters. Iraqi-American Zainab al-Suwaij gave moderate Muslims a voice in the polarised American debates that followed the 9/11 attacks. To many, she’s a hero of free speech.
The terrorist attacks of 9/11 gave Islam a bad press in the United States, and American Muslims were put on the defensive. Unhappy about this polarisation, Zainab al-Suwaij and some others established the American Islamic Congress (AIC) with the aim of promoting religious dialogue and tolerance. “Why should religious differences divide us? We did not want to let that happen. We had to focus on what we had in common. The attacks of 9/11 were also an attack on us, American Muslims.”
Al-Suwaij, the granddaughter of a well known ayatollah in southern Iraq, was one of the few women who took an active part in the 1991 Shi'ite revolt against Saddam Hussein. She fled to the United States after the uprising failed. From the moment of her arrival on American soil, al-Suwaij wanted to do something with her newly acquired freedom. “I found Muslims in the US always playing the victim card, complaining of discrimination and so on. I didn’t want to complain, I wanted to be pro-active.”
The impetus to take action came after 9/11. Al-Suwaij wanted to show that Islam can be a positive, constructive force, advocating gender equality and mutual understanding between religious communities. Today the AIC, with al-Suwaij as its director, trains hundreds of young members in non-violent activism and social media mobilisation. In ten years time, what began as an informal students’ club has grown grew into an international organisation with more than 100 employees and six offices in the United States, Egypt and Iraq.
Religious dialogue often seems to be defined by politically correct, multicultural dinner parties or monologues from religious leaders that make reconciliation seem further away than ever. The AIC, explains al-Suwaij, keeps itself distant from such things. “We don’t want religious leaders. We want normal people who talk about daily life issues and ask the question: How can we work together? What are our common goals?”
If you want religious dialogue, says al-Suwaij, ask yourself how you can benefit as many people as possible. “Make sure you do a project together for the larger community. Then it doesn’t matter anymore which religious book you read.” Even more important, she says, is the awareness that you have a common interest in the rejection of radicalism. “We don’t believe in violence; we don’t believe that people of other faiths are our enemies; we reject the extreme and radical views others want to impose on us. We cannot tolerate religious leaders preaching hate.”
Dutch Muslims have often wondered why they should feel responsible for the terrorist acts of a bunch of half-mad radicals. Al-Suwaij does not approve of this attitude: “Of course you are responsible! Violence is conducted in the name of your religion, so it is your responsibility to denounce it. It is part of our training. When you see something wrong, you should speak out against it. Otherwise you are condoning it.”