Radio Netherlands Worldwide

SSO Login

More login possibilities:

Close
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
Home
Monday 13 February RNW - NEWS AND ANALYSIS FROM THE NETHERLANDS IN 10 LANGUAGES, WORLDWIDE 24/7 ON RADIO, TV AND ONLINE
Artistic impression of the Advanced Technology Vessel (Ahirant)
Johan van Slooten's picture
Map
Delhi, India
Delhi, India

India launches first nuclear submarine

Published on : 27 July 2009 - 2:49pm | By Johan van Slooten
More about:

India has launched its first nuclear submarine. The 3 billion dollar vessel had been in development for twenty years and its launch underlines India's status as one of the world's leading nuclear powers. It already has several nuclear weapons.
But does India actually need a nuclear submarine?

Professor Ko Colijn, a Dutch military and international relations specialist with the Netherlands Institute for Foreign Affairs Clingendael, says India believes it does. “It’s the aim of the big powers – which India thinks it belongs to – to have an ultimate nuclear deterrent capacity. In this field, a submarine is supposed to be part of that ultimate capacity”.

 

Isolation
India is one of only a handful of nuclear powers in the world, although it refuses to ratify the worldwide nuclear non proliferation treaty. This has led to years of isolation when many countries – including the US – refused to trade nuclear technology and knowledge with India.

Last year, however, President George W. Bush changed his mind and allowed a nuclear deal between India and the US, a move that was endorsed by French President Nicolas Sarkozy. Sunday’s submarine launch was another sign that India is slowly coming out of its nuclear isolation.
 

Flashpoint
With other countries in the region, such as Pakistan and China, also making huge steps in the development of nuclear technology, some critics fear this region could be a dangerous nuclear flashpoint. “There is definitely a nuclear arms race going on in the Indian Ocean area”, Mr Colijn agrees. “But as far as this submarine is concerned, it is more directed at China, which already has several nuclear submarines. India merely wants to follow in China’s footsteps”.

Indian Prime Minister Mammohan Singh said at the launch that the submarine will not be used to threaten India’s neighbours, such as Pakistan, which in itself is a nuclear power. “We don’t have any aggressive designs”, he said.
 

Poverty
With millions of Indians living in extreme poverty, it will be hard for Mr Singh to justify the three billion dollars investment, says Mr Colijn. “He will face some criticism, internally and from abroad. But on the other hand, India is a very large country and it is emerging as a big power that would like to belong to the big clubs like G8 or the G20. India will see this investment as a justification of its position as an upcoming superpower”.

Should the West be worried about these developments? “Not really, as both the Americans and the French have already supported this modernisation”, says Mr Colijn. “It depends on what the Indians want to achieve. I don’t think they have the ambition to become a world dominating nuclear power. There’s only a limited, regional ambition”.
 

Listen to a Newsline interview with Prof. Ko Colijn:

Related articles

Discussion

Kshatriya 3 August 2009 - 10:55am
India has to work on the path to keep a balance. Just like India is avoiding any war on Pakistan due to Pakistan being a nuclear country, so, China might think the same way and avoid any war. India has to do a lot to even reach near to China in terms of defence equipments. Nuke sub is one among them. And US is trying to keep this balance by giving India Nuke deal. US too doesn't want China to be dominating in the region. Whatever the reason is, India, China and Pakistan too are developing because of this race, either defence or economic. China is leading in that race of course, but we are developing exponentialy. Competetion gives you will to exceed your limits.
David Berridge 2 August 2009 - 3:08am
What is remarkably missing from the above commentaries, is that the final deployment of this new submarine will complete India's triad of being able to deliver a nuclear weapon from the sea as well as from the air and ground. Pakistan cannot be today considered the one and major reason to achieve this triad, as the nuclear capability will not defeat the Taliban or any other terrorist group attempting to control the country. This strategic enhancement by India is more a direct response to the growing presence and capability of China's naval power and its extension at a rapid rate. This submarine response is more in keeping the balance of power staus quo in the region as a whole, rather than just concentrating on India's common border area with Pakistan. The previous discourses have unfortunately digressed from this truly significant fact.
jasmin 2 August 2009 - 1:46pm
You are right David, and I did say about our scheming neighbours, though I did not name China. These days their activities are creating tremors in our parliament.
Anonymous 1 August 2009 - 4:54pm
In this country we find it pays to shoot an admiral from time to time to encourage others.(Voltaire, Candide)
jasmin 30 July 2009 - 6:48pm
"It's important to strut your stuff," says a naval planner, "you visit a foreign port and invite your counterparts to a cocktail party on board. While sipping their drinks on the warship's deck, they are taking note of the weaponry you're carrying. You're sending a clear message." The desire for a more powerful and visible navy is rooted in growing concern over India's 7,516 km of coastline, the vulnerability of which stood exposed during the 26/11 terrorist strikes. Protection is also needed for an exclusive economic zone of 2 million sq km, which may go up to 2.5 million sq km once India's continental shelf is delineated and placed before the International Seabed Authority. Naval officers point out that India's entire land mass is just 3.28 million sq km Courtesy:Rediff.com news
jasmin 29 July 2009 - 4:29pm
Hiram, US has always been involved one way or the other, in Asian affairs for decades. Be it in Japan, Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Indo-Pak conflicts and now bombing Swat with drones. And in every conflict precious lives have been lost!
Hiram 29 July 2009 - 6:06pm
No response: :)
jasmin 30 July 2009 - 6:49pm
:)
jasmin 28 July 2009 - 5:02pm
'' India has been in turmoil and will always be in turmoil. Don't put all the blame on the US.'' Hiram, India was in turmoil due to invaders of muslim origin and the British. British divided and ruled and our politicians listened to them. But, that was in 1947, now what is US doing here in the Indian subcontinent since decades? You know it, the world knows it, US is backing Pakistan in her dirty politics, and is the cause of recent turmoils. Ask US to withdraw the aid to Pakistan totally and stop meddling in the affairs of the subcontinent and then see how things improve politically!
Hiram 28 July 2009 - 8:31pm
"Ask US to withdraw the aid to Pakistan totally and stop meddling in the affairs of the subcontinent and then see how things improve politically!"...Jasmin, I totally agree about the US getting involved in places like India and Pakistan. In fact, I think the US coperations should be penalized for exporting jobs from the US to countries like India and Pakistan. The reason is for two reasons and it is because India and Pakistan pays it's workers lower wages than the US and EU; and, the Pak/India use slave labour in the form of children. They abuse their children because of greed and meddling. { The conflict between India has nothing to do with the US's support to Pakistan or India. Both get financial support from the US. I wonder how much money the Indian govt sent to the victims of Katrina? You can bet the US sent money and food to India and Asia during their tsunamis. Every year Congress gives billions of tax payers dollars to countries like India, while Americans are starving, have no homes, and get a poor education. Jasmin, India's and Pakistans problems are due to religion, over-population, and greed. { India's new toy was built not for defense but for intimidation. Now, Pakistan will have to have their toy to prove to the Indians how mighty they are. As the song goes "the road nevers end." The Indians in India are the cause and effect of a problem they started by allowing India to be separated. Namaste!
jasmin 29 July 2009 - 4:51am
Hiram, US never gives without strings to any country. US aid is directed to terrorist and defence activities by Pakistan, both the parties admit, wonder why don't you! US exports jobs to India and Pakistan, not to help them but they pay low wages to them and save millions of dollars every year.During natural catastrophes, every country helps the victim country, and I remeber that help had poured in during Indian tsunami but our government had politely refused as they said that they were capable of handling it. The bulk of aid went to Sri Lanka!India's problems are due to religion and overpopulation indeed, but the muslims get aid and moral support from abroad! And the US aid reaches them from across the border. It is complicated Hiram, you are too naive and good to understand it! And yes, if US can have all the defence toys, so can we! US intimidates the world, we intimidate our neighbours!Sometimes mere show of a weapon works and you don't need to invade countries and kill millions, the way US does in Asia! Namaste!
Steve 29 July 2009 - 3:08pm
Jasmine, I do not think that the US wants India to be in a state of turmoil. Pakistan will not allow the US to protect their nuclear arsenal with force so the American government gives them funds to protect it. The US has wanted to audit how these funds are used for some time, but Packistan routinely refuses. Most Americans know India is a much stronger US ally than our "ally" Packistan. I have no doubt that some of the US funds are used to attack India. Just as some of the funds are funneled to the insurgents in hiding in Packistan that routinely cross into Afghanistan to attack US troops. I do not have a solution as to how to keep nuclear arms out of the hands of terrorists in a situation like this. I do know that it is in the best interest of the entire world, including India, to keep Packistan's precarious democracy afloat instead of letting the Taliban gain access to nuclear arms. At least with this structure there is a face to negotiate with instead of a disorganized group only motivated by ideals.
jasmin 29 July 2009 - 4:34pm
And you know Steve, Pakistan got its nuclear knowhow from the Netherlands! Their scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan is married to a Dutch woman and he worked in Netherlands as a scientist! See wikipedia:[edit] Work in the Netherlands In 1972, the year he received his PhD, Khan joined the staff of the Physical Dynamics Research Laboratory (FDO) in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. FDO was a subcontractor for URENCO, the uranium enrichment facility at Almelo in the Netherlands, which had been established in 1970 by the United Kingdom, West Germany, and the Netherlands to assure a supply of enriched uranium for the European nuclear reactors. The URENCO facility used Zippe-type centrifuge technology to separate the fissionable isotope uranium-235 out of uranium hexafluoride gas by spinning a mixture of the two isotopes at up to 100,000 revolutions a minute. The technical details of these centrifuge systems are regulated as secret information by export controls because they could be used for the purposes of nuclear proliferation. In May 1974, India carried out its first nuclear test, code named Smiling Buddha, to the great alarm of the Government of Pakistan. Around this time, Khan having a distinguished career and being one of the senior most scientists at the nuclear plant he worked at, had privileged access to the most restricted areas of the URENCO facility as well as to documentation on the gas centrifuge technology. India's surprise nuclear test and the subsequent Pakistani scramble to establish a deterrent caused great alarm to the Pakistani government as well as the Pakistani diaspora including individuals like Khan. A subsequent investigation by the Dutch authorities found that he had passed highly-classified material to a network of Pakistani intelligence agents; however, they found no evidence that he was sent to the Netherlands as a spy nor were they able to determine whether he approached the Government of Pakistan about espionage first or whether they had approached him. In December 1975, after having stolen the gas centrifuge blueprints, Khan suddenly left the Netherlands; he returned to Pakistan in 1976.[10]. The former Dutch Prime Minister, Ruud Lubbers, said in early August 2005 that the Government of the Netherlands knew of Khan "stealing" the secrets of nuclear technology but let him go on at least two occasions after the CIA expressed their wish to continue monitoring his movements.
Steve 30 July 2009 - 1:38pm
Dont forget who he sold the technology too. Libya, Iran, North Korea. All peace loving places
jasmin 30 July 2009 - 6:52pm
Yes, he did! And the CIA looked the other way....They first create a frankenstein and then run for cover! You reap, what you sow!
Hiram 29 July 2009 - 2:55pm
Jasmin, Cate told me it wasn't nice of me to have the last word; therefore, I am letting you have have the last reply. P.S. Before I let you have the last reply, can you clarify how the evil United States killed millions in Asia? Be nice, okay? I am just asking a question of clarification.
Steve 27 July 2009 - 7:08pm
Thank you Jasmine. Packistan keeps lobbying US politicians for more money stating they need it to keep the Taliban fighters from gaining access to their nuclear arsenal. They will not let the US audit where the funds are spent. They keep "running out" of money and needing more, and they keep getting it. This is what happened in the 80s with Al-Queda. America needs to realize you can not "throw money" at a problem to make it go away. Pakistan has shown multiple times it is not a US ally despite what agreements have been signed. The Pakistani government is playing the American government and people for fools and succeeding in doing so. This is not an optional expense for India, nor is expanding their military presence. As you stated India is surrounded by enemies and it must do what it has to to protect itself and its citizens.
jasmin 28 July 2009 - 2:41pm
Thank you, Steve!Pakistan is adept at playing dirty games.They are supporting insurgents in India and indulging in cross border terrorism. Recently, Indian Intelligence of Punjab has arrested a prominent Sikh who was taking people on religious tours to Pakistan, every year. The ISI of Pakistan lured him and made him deliver defence secrets, and gave him training in spying and paid him through hawala transactions. This is one instance. Prez Zardari has accepted that they have been nurturing terrorists for crossborder activities as a state policy! Even Pentagon has released information that the billions of US dollars of aid have been used for anti-India activity! US knows and secretly allows Pakistan to keep India busy in defending borders and control insurgency instead of focussing on growth! Had Pakistan been wisely ruled after partition in 1947, and had they not indulged in warfares against India and focussed on their growth as a stable and prosperous nation, the picture of the Indian subcontinent would have been different! But, guess, this is what US doesn't want! US wants the world to be in turmoil, it suits them!
Hiram 28 July 2009 - 3:26pm
"Had Pakistan been wisely ruled after partition in 1947, and had they not indulged in warfares against India and focussed on their growth as a stable and prosperous nation, the picture of the Indian subcontinent would have been different! But, guess, this is what US doesn't want! US wants the world to be in turmoil, it suits them!" Wrong! India should have never allowed India to be split by religion. She and the British are the cause and effect of the problems in India. India did not rule wisely and they listen to British and Muslims. { As to the world's turmoil, the the world had been in turmoil long before the US came upon the scene. The world is always in turmoil because it suits man. It is the nature of man. { India has been in turmoil and will always be in turmoil. Don't put all the blame on the US.
jasmin 27 July 2009 - 6:42pm
The millions of poor Indians sleep soundly because they know that our armed forces are protecting the borders from our jealous and threatening neighbours on all sides. Please do not forget 26/11 when Pakistani trained men entered through sea because we trusted our honourable neighbours will not stoop so low, in guerilla warfare. Mr. Singh knows about poverty and defence of his country more than Mr. Colijn. Wonder what the Dutch PM would have done had the Netherlands been surrounded by enemies! The name Arihant of the nuclear submarine means: destroyer of the enemies. And we do need defence of all sorts when US and EU are pumping millions of dollars into Pakistan, and China is supporting Pakistan against India. We all know where the dollars will be spent: on defence and proxy war against India. Recently the villages of Amritsar on the Attari-Wagah border were attacked by 5 rockets from the Pakistani side. There was little damage as they fell in the paddy fields. On enquiry by the Indian border security force, the Pakistani Rangers feined ignorance and said that maybe it was the handiwork of Taliban near the border, which is ridiculous as Pakistani army claims to have shot down Taliban and they are nowhere near Lahore!!. In such circumstances, do you think we can relax? Poor or rich, every citizen needs to be protected. And yes, India has every right to pursue every goal despite her poverty because poverty in India has religious, political and cultural basis. The favourite of RNW, Chief Minister Mayawati of UP is one cause of poverty!

Post new comment

Please be reminded all comments must be in English, short and to the point - guideline 250 words. Abusive and inappropriate comments will be removed.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Video highlights

Homs: where is the UN?
The citizens of Homs in Syria are under attack and are asking the UN for...
In from Holland
On this week's show: winter weather takes hold of the country, we find out...

RNW on Facebook

Sign up for our newsletters

Email news bulletin

What's on - Programme Preview

Press Review - of the leading Dutch newspapers every weekday

Media Network

Euro Hit 40 - Europe's No. 1 chart show

RNW - News and analysis from the Netherlands in 10 languages, worldwide 24/7 on radio, television and online