"You have to be tolerant about tolerance," says South African poet Antjie Krog. "There have to be clear regulations about how people deal with one another," says lawyer Gerard Spong. A court case against Geert Wilders, leader of the far-right PVV, starts next week. Mr Wilders has been accused of discrimination and inciting hate. It's a case that also explores the boundaries of tolerance.
Krog is a guest at Winternachten, an annual literary festival held in The Hague. In her opening address, she called for tolerance and interconnectedness, the notion that everything and everyone on the planet is reciprocally connected.
Overwhelmed
In 1989, she made her first visit to the Netherlands from what was then a racist, apartheid South Africa and she still remembers it well, "I was overwhelmed by the tolerance. On the front page of a newspaper I read an article about the rights of lesbians and gays in an old people's home. And I thought, what an amazingly free country this is. Real freedom. At home, one didn't even dare say homosexual out loud. But, with the passing of years, the Netherlands sounds more and more like apartheid South Africa".
Radical
She continues, "Apartheid radicalised black South Africans. Black people felt forced to turn against whites and to fight them. I'm very worried now because Muslims are becoming more radical. The way that the western world deals with Islam, forces people to take sides. It doesn't help them solve their own problems. Many people feel forced to wear a headscarf, otherwise they won't be real Muslims. Outward expressions of religious belief should never be suppressed".
Wilders trial
The trial of PVV leader Geert Wilders begins next week. He has called Islam a backward religion and frequently agitates against headscarves and the number of mosques in the Netherlands. The far right politician has been accused of inciting hatred and discriminating against Muslims. His political party enjoys a great deal of support among the Dutch electorate.
Mr Wilders was brought to trial after a number of people filed complaints against him. One of them is the well-known Dutch criminal defence lawyer Gerard Spong. Although Mr Spong has refused to comment on the trial, he did deliver a lecture on regulation at Winternachten.
"I'm calling for clearer regulation in the law," says Mr Spong. "The article in the constitution on freedom of expression has led to a maze of legal rulings. A vast number of ethnic and religious communities want to live here in peaceful co-operation. In order to make this extremely complicated society governable, we need explicit, clear-cut regulations about what is and what is not permissible. We have to treat each other decently. It doesn't matter whether that stems from good manners, the law of the land or religious belief, but we have to treat each other decently."
Convince people
Antjie Krog is disturbed by the trial of Mr Wilders, "I want to live in country where people care about each other. If you have to use the law to force people to allow others the space to be themselves... well, I'd find that absolutely awful ".
The poet has first-hand experience of how apartheid divided South Africa. She says that South Africa's apartheid regime was similar to intolerance because it shut some people out, "intolerance leads to destruction. My country is not a paradise of tolerance, but we know very well that intolerance will destroy you in the end".
Krog consistently calls for tolerance, "you want newcomers to the country accept the liberal, tolerant values. If someone comes here who doesn't share those values, then you have to find a tolerant manner to convince people to accept them. In order to survive here, it's important that they accept liberalism and toleration."
In the square in front of the lower house of parliament she sees an article from the constitution, carved into a long stone bench. It's the article that says that everybody in the Netherlands is equal. "That is fantastic," says Krog, "there isn't a better foundation than that".




























Geert is only going to face trial because of his own stupidity and ignorance in exercising his freedoms to lead a recognized political party in the Netherlands. Pym Fortouyn was far more sophisticated and presentable to the Dutch electorate no matter his party's standings in the polls. Geert's defintion of the "Body Politic" is to have the collective backsides of his supporters inexorably joined to his big mouth. This political anatomical arrangement is the "Social Contract" Geert wishes to have dictated to the people of the Netherlands regardless of whether they vote for him or not. I personally find it remarkable that it is easy to criticize Queen Beatrix no end ( and including arguements that her Christmas addresses to the nation are useless and should be done away with ) over the subject how the internet has affected social relations and communications in the Netherlands, and yet Geert is cheered on by a large segment of Dutch society for bringing the independent judicary to do it's duty, and judge a potential violation of Dutch law. If intelligent commentary is censured in the Netherlands in favour of the ravings of mass popluism, then why is Geert afraid to face the courts and be deemed a martyr? Let Geert face a judge and declare himself guilty as charged of committing acts of "free speach", and let him have what he desires in an hour of glory. Or is Geert really concerned that the laws of the land will be upheld in the one ultimate venue where they apply more than in the court of public opinion? If the Dutch allow Geert the legal and constitutional powers to do all thier thinking and speaking for them, then tolerance and mutal respect will evaporate along with this forum.
Mr. Wilders is correct and he should get a chance te become the PM of The Netherlands. In historical perspective development the Dutch came from Mr. Hein (greatest pirate of the North Sea), through masters of trade in slaves (transporters of black Africans to the Americas, VOC mentality), the colonials of Indonesia, Suriname, Antilles etc. to the greedy bankers with hugh bonus at the moment. This mentality should have a followup at the moment. Suppose 20% of the Dutch population supports Mr. Wilders, that is about 3 million people with this mentality. Mr. Wilders is the DUTCH leader and the DUTCH face for all the others countries in our galaxy.
Vote for Mr. Wild en make him Emperor of our Galaxy. Good luck Mr. Dutchman.
Tolerance also means accepting unorthodox views of people like Geert Wilders. Obviously, he's trying to strike political capital out of his sweeping statements, but so are his opponents.
There is so much good in the worst of us, and so much bad in the best of us, that it hardly becomes any of us to talk about the rest of us.
Social relationships between different ethnicities, thrive only on one law-of Give and Take, not violence but Love. When there is only Give, or only Take, then the relations whither..We have to strike a social balance to co-exist in harmony.Poets speak from their heart and Lawyers speak from their head, we need people who speak from their soul and touch the souls of all ethnicities. For souls are part of the Whole and are above prejudices.
Post new comment
Please be reminded all comments must be in English, short and to the point - guideline 250 words. Abusive and inappropriate comments will be removed.