Radio Netherlands Worldwide

SSO Login

More login possibilities:

Close
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
Home
Monday 13 February RNW - NEWS AND ANALYSIS FROM THE NETHERLANDS IN 10 LANGUAGES, WORLDWIDE 24/7 ON RADIO, TV AND ONLINE
Taking off from Schiphol Airport
Frank Scimone's picture
Map
Schiphol Airport, Netherlands
Schiphol Airport, Netherlands

Dutch airline passengers win landmark flight delay suit

Published on : 5 March 2010 - 1:35pm | By Frank Scimone (Photo: RNW/Fred Vloo)
More about:

A Dutch court ruling ordering an airline to pay compensation to passengers who suffered long delays during a 2007 flight has set a new precedent in passenger rights.

The ruling by a Haarlem court stipulates that all Dutch passengers who have suffered delays of more than three hours on European flights over the past five years can claim up to 600 euros in compensation. European airlines fear they could face between three and five billion euros a year in claims. 

The ruling is the first following the introduction of new legislation cracking down on airlines passed by the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg in November. For years airlines used loopholes to circumvent legislation ordering them to compensate passengers suffering from overbooking or delays as required by the European Commission. 

No more loopholes
The Dutch ruling is a precedent because it is the first based on the new European Court of Justice legislation, which did away with the loophole.

In order for a Dutch passenger to receive compensation he or she must file suit in the Netherlands. "And that is what has just happened," says today's de Volkskrant. The paper quotes the lawyer of the two plaintiffs, who suffered a delay of more than 24 hours in a 2007 flight with the Dutch airline Martinair. Lawyer Peter Meijer describes the ruling as a "breakthrough" in the rights of airline passengers. 

Martinair argued that it did not intend to reimburse the passengers because of 'extraordinary circumstances', namely technical problems. However the Haarlem court pointed to the recent ruling by the European Court of Justice that technical problems did not constitute 'extraordinary circumstances'. 

Meijer alone has hundreds of similar cases which he now intends to bring to court. Thousands more are in the hands of Dutch insurance companies and other lawyers. The possibility that courts in other European Union countries will rule in a similar fashion is a nightmare scenario for airlines. 

Unfair, says Dutch MEP
Several weeks ago Radio Netherlands Worldwide wrote that European airlines were in a state of near panic as a result of the November ruling by the European Court of Justice. The Dutch Christian Democratic Euro-parliamentarian Corien Wortmann told Radio Netherlands Worldwide that the 600-euro reimbursement for delays of more than three hours - which can be claimed retroactively for five years - "could possibly cost the airlines billions of euros." The MEP says the ruling is not fair for Dutch airlines because the Netherlands has a stricter transport inspectorate which is more likely to enforce the regulations. 

Ms Wortmann also finds the possibility of filing a suit five years retroactively as going "too far". She says the ruling does not say anything about whether extreme weather conditions constitute 'extraordinary circumstances'. "And every judge can interpret this differently."

 

 

Related articles

Discussion

Emmitt 6 March 2010 - 4:08pm / USA

Finally a ruling that will make the airlines get their schedules in order. Overbooking and other such foolishness will be the exception and not the norm. This is coming to the States one day. Humans are not freight. They should not be treated as such.
Also, if the passengers are going to go through all of the new security steps and arrive early and book early and everything else that we are asked to do in order to make the system work, then one should fairly expect that the airlines will do their part as well to make the system work for everyone and not just their shareholders.

Chenry 6 March 2010 - 10:39am / Spain

This is another example of the stifling rule making of Brussel. The EU and the European Parlement are increasingly alieniating themselve from the European citizens.
Overbooking is caused by passengers not showing up after their booking.
Delays are caused by either weather or technical equipment failure.
Equipment that is not made by the airlines themselves. So is the weather.

Brussel must really have an enormous crooked mind to blame the airlines for this.

Anonymous 6 March 2010 - 10:36am / Spain

This is another example of the stifling rule making of Brussel. The EU and the European Parlement are increasingly alieniating themselve from the European citizens.
Overbooking is caused by passengers not showing up after their booking.
Delays are caused by either weather or technical equipment failure.
Equipment that is not made by the airlines themselves. So is the weather.

Brussel must really have an enormous crooked mind to blame the airlines for this.

Post new comment

Please be reminded all comments must be in English, short and to the point - guideline 250 words. Abusive and inappropriate comments will be removed.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Video highlights

Homs: where is the UN?
The citizens of Homs in Syria are under attack and are asking the UN for...
In from Holland
On this week's show: winter weather takes hold of the country, we find out...

RNW on Facebook

Sign up for our newsletters

Email news bulletin

What's on - Programme Preview

Press Review - of the leading Dutch newspapers every weekday

Media Network

Euro Hit 40 - Europe's No. 1 chart show

RNW - News and analysis from the Netherlands in 10 languages, worldwide 24/7 on radio, television and online