Radio Netherlands Worldwide

SSO Login

More login possibilities:

Close
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
Home
Monday 13 February RNW - NEWS AND ANALYSIS FROM THE NETHERLANDS IN 10 LANGUAGES, WORLDWIDE 24/7 ON RADIO, TV AND ONLINE
Greening of the Computer Industry
Marnie Chesterton's picture
Map
Hilversum, Netherlands
Hilversum, Netherlands

The dirty not-so-little secret: computers emit same pollution as aeroplanes

Published on : 8 October 2009 - 4:41pm | By Marnie Chesterton
More about:

Before you get on a plane, there’s a good chance you will have looked at alternative travel options, or at least been asked to off-set your carbon footprint. If you’ve done neither, you’ll probably be left with at least a teensy kernel of guilt.

 

Listen to an interview with Dr Wissner-Gross

Aviation is often condemned, attacked as an example of our carbon-careless behaviour. But maybe it shouldn’t shoulder all the blame alone. Plane travel may responsible for 2% of human-generated CO2 emissions but then, so does your computer and the web it connects to. So how come IT hasn’t had nearly the same flak?

Computers don't have tail-pipes
Dr Alexander Wissner-Gross, who studies the environmental impact of computing at Harvard University, thinks he knows the answer.

“The concept of a carbon footprint is not nearly as visibly localised as when you drive a car – the car has a tail-pipe and you can see quite clearly emission coming out of the rear of the car. Computers don’t have tail pipes.”

Computers may not have an exhaust pipe but they are still gas-guzzlers. Being part of a big buzzing global internet comes at a price. The whole system runs off huge amounts of electricity, most of which comes from fossil fuels burnt in power stations. When we log on to our computers, we don’t see all the hidden costs, as Wissner Gross explains:

“Really when you are visiting a website, there’s a whole chain of events that’s initiated that requires power consumption from one side of the world to the other (if you are visiting an international site.) Electricity spans devices in this case. And this is a really interesting, largely unsolved problem: how do you get a hold on electricity consumption and footprint management when your environmental footprint spans multiple devices around the world.”

Internet bad for the planet

Not all computer time is equally green. Several factors can rack up the emissions, including, the location of the computer, the location of the server, the size of the webpage you are on, download sizes and download speeds. An average web surf produces 20mg of carbon dioxide per second. To put that in to context, that’s twice the amount we emit from breathing.

It’s something to bear in mind next time you waste hours watching videos of piano-playing cats on Youtube. But there are ways of greening the industry. The simplest way is to ensure that the power from the grid comes from renewable energy sources. Many in the IT industry also believe that computing can be a weapon against our carbon dioxide emissions. Cisco, the largest maker of networking equipment in the world, claims that using its teleconferencing equipment actually saves on emissions because workers need to travel less often for meetings:

 “There is a significant substitution taking place,” says senior director Bart Sweerman. “In fact a lot of executives are quite happy to substitute one or two trips a week by using telepresence technology.”

While there are calls for all of us to fly less in the future, computers are not going anywhere. Or rather, they are going everywhere. It’s predicted that by 2020, one in three households will own a computer, more than that if you include the ever-growing number of mobile phones. By then, the industry will be in the spotlight, centre stage and under much more pressure to green up its act.
 

Does the IT deserve the same eco-finger-pointing that airlines receive? Leave your comment here:

Discussion

Vanesa 26 March 2010 - 11:14am

It' amazing how many information we can get from the web. I'm going to tell all my colleagues from Trianz all about it so they wouldn't use their computers as much as they do.

build your own solar panels 12 November 2009 - 6:46pm
IT definitely deserves the same attention. It has increased productivity but how many real tangible, non-commercial benefits (medicine aside, and even that is at a huge cost and for the privileged few) has it brought? I remember reading an article about Google datacenters and how much it costs the earth each time a Google search is done (I recall that the way the datacenters communicate with each other is far from efficient either). Chris
Owen 9 October 2009 - 11:43am
"So how come IT hasn’t had nearly the same flak? " Probably because a significant fraction of the earths population use a computer daily, while a much, much smaller number fly occasionally. Yet that tiny number causes as much pollution.
Vann 8 October 2009 - 11:57pm
This was a very interesting report, but I think doesn't really look at the big picture. Many websites work in a virtual server space, so that hundreds of websites can be "served" by one computer. I routinely steer business clients towards working in a virtual server environment, instead of leasing a dedicated server for their website. This approach is very efficient, allowing one computer to provide web pages to thousands of users at one time. Also, I don't think we're looking at how much carbon is saved by me not getting into my car and then driving to the library to look up information, as I used to have to do. Today, I can find information via my computer, and even download audiobook through my library's website. In fact, my marketing business is home based, which would be impossible without a computer and high speed internet. Instead of commuting daily, my car sits in the driveway, and is only used rarely. Just as our U.S. government has forced automobile manufacturers to produce more highly efficient cars with greater miles per gallon, or kilometer, we should encourage computer manufacturers to do the same and to have large labels with energy ratings so consumers can buy more efficient computers. Most computer buyers are looking at the amount of RAM and other features their computer has, and not at the amount of electricity it consumes. Lastly, many computer users don't take advantage of energy saving settings on their computers, which can also help. Unfortunately, may computer users are afraid of their computers, and only want to turn them off and on. Lastly, I enjoy listening to Radio Netherlands, on my G4 laptop, through iTunes. Now I don't have use my old vacuum tube filled shortwave receiver. ; - )
Steve 9 October 2009 - 3:49pm
I have seen many new ads touting a processor's power efficiency. Since the processor is by far the largest consumer of energy in a computer newer more efficient processors will definitely help first world nations. The fact that many older computers are then resold or donated to second and third world countries will only shift the problem.

Post new comment

Please be reminded all comments must be in English, short and to the point - guideline 250 words. Abusive and inappropriate comments will be removed.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Video highlights

Homs: where is the UN?
The citizens of Homs in Syria are under attack and are asking the UN for...
In from Holland
On this week's show: winter weather takes hold of the country, we find out...

RNW on Facebook

Sign up for our newsletters

Email news bulletin

What's on - Programme Preview

Press Review - of the leading Dutch newspapers every weekday

Media Network

Euro Hit 40 - Europe's No. 1 chart show

RNW - News and analysis from the Netherlands in 10 languages, worldwide 24/7 on radio, television and online