Radio Netherlands Worldwide

SSO Login

More login possibilities:

  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • LinkedIn
Sunday 21 December  
Dutch traffic in wintry conditions
Iain Macintyre's picture
The Hague, Netherlands
The Hague, Netherlands

Controversy over Dutch kilometre charge poll

Published on : 25 January 2010 - 4:39pm | By Iain Macintyre
More about:

Health Minister Ab Klink says the cabinet will have the final decision about the controversial plan to introduce a "pay-to-drive" kilometre charge for motorists.

The Kilometre Charge

If the kilometre charge is introduced, the Netherlands will be the only country with a national system of this kind. Some cities, like London and Stockholm, impose a surcharge on traffic entering the city centre. Singapore is the only place with a comparable system.

What it is
For years Dutch politicians have been looking for a new and more equitable way to tax motorists. The kilometre charge is based on the distance travelled by each vehicle. It will replace vehicle purchase tax (BPM) and road tax.

How it works
A special box built into your car communicates with a satellite and records the number of kilometres you travel. Nine million of these boxes will have to be installed.

What it will cost
In theory, nothing. Motorists currently pay 6.6 billion euros in car-related taxes. The charge is intended to distribute this tax burden more fairly.

When it's coming
The cabinet decided in November 2009 to introduce the charge. Parliament now has its say. The bill has the support of the three coalition parties (Christian Democrats, Labour and Christian Union), Green Left, Democrats 66 and the Animal Rights Party. The conservative VVD, the Socialist Party and Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party are against it.

Speaking on the TV programme Buitenhof, he effectively distanced himself from Transport Minister and fellow Christian Democrat Camiel Eurlings who said on Friday that, as far as he was concerned, the issue would largely be decided by the result of a poll of its members being held by the Dutch Royal Touring Club (ANWB) and he would withdraw the scheme if it did not have the support of the motoring association.

Mr Klink emphasized that the Transport Minister carries the main responsibility for any decision and remarked that he did not believe his colleague would shirk that burden. He assumed Mr Eurlings was simply pointing out that public support is an important factor in introducing new legislation, but he did not believe the cabinet's decision "would depend on a yes or no from the ANWB".

Political responsibility
Kees Vendrik, MP for the opposition Green Left, also appearing on Buitenhof, had a different opinion of Mr Eurlings motives. "Minister Eurlings sees the weak position of the cabinet and thinks: once this lot are no longer in power I'll be identified with this law. He's no longer prepared to take responsibility for the bill he launched two months ago". 

On Monday morning ANWB director Guido van Woerkom said on TV that the poll was "never intended as a referendum" and his organisation only wanted to advise the minister.

No representative vote
The ANWB vote has been criticised as "not representative" by well-known Dutch pollster Maurice de Hond since only 37 percent of ANWB members have indicated they will cast a vote. He points out that, by explicitly linking his decision to the poll, the minister is effectively providing opponents of the kilometre charge with an incentive to take part.

In the meantime, the Dutch daily De Telegraaf conducted its own poll over the weekend. Nearly 140,00 people had responded by Sunday evening, most of them opposed to the road pricing scheme. Most readers were worried about the costs, while many did not believe it would solve the problem of traffic jams and others regarded it as an invasion of their privacy.

© Radio Netherlands Worldwide



Anonymous 17 March 2011 - 4:51pm

Why do it with a black box and GPS? It's luckily off the list but:...

* you could add road tax to the fuel tax. You would also pay as you drive (or sit in traffic with idling engine- then you pay).

* one could reduce tax on CO2 neutral biofuels as e.g. biogas, sustainably produced vegoil or really green electricity.
With this it could also have the effect of de-centralising the fuel market as many can produce their own fuel instead of relying on large scale industry :)

Same effect but much simpler, less bureaucracy, less costs and no privacy concerns.

But that's not the agenda of modern governments....why??

Post new comment

Please be reminded all comments must be in English, short and to the point - guideline 250 words. Abusive and inappropriate comments will be removed.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

RNW on Facebook

RNW Player

Video highlights

Ladies on the move
RNW is keen on featuring inspiring women in our target countries, women who...
What about men?
In many countries, men don't stick around to raise their children. This is...